Impact of Nebraska's loss vs. the CSC + discussing Lane Kiffin's Vanity Fair article
The College Sports Commission wins their battle against Nebraska athletes. Why are Lane Kiffin and coaching salaries are being discussed in congress? Discussing Lane Kiffin's Vanity Fair article.
Subscribe to the College Football Enquirer Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube The ruling is in and it's a big one for the College Sports Commission. 18 Nebraska athletes lost their battle against the CSC. The athletes had challenged the CSC's ruling of rejected NIL deals.
However, there is a catch. Ross Dellenger shares that Bryan Seely, the College Sports Commission's CEO, explained that these athletes can still get their NIL deals approved by submitting their deals a different way. Andy Staples and Steven Godfrey join the conversation and the group discusses the impact of this ruling and what it means for the future of the CSC.
Then, Ross' Congressional Minute returns as he gives the latest update on the SCORE Act. The guys dive into some of the changes that have been made to the SCORE Act. Most notably, the look at the Lane Kiffin rule and rules surrounding coaching salaries and buyouts?
The Lane Kiffin rule prevents coaches from talking to other schools about a job while in season. The crew discusses if any of the rules could actually be implemented and alternative solutions to these issues. Later, one of the biggest stories in college football is the recent Lane Kiffin article in Vanity Fair.