Talking Points: Wolves vs Sunderland – Hair Pull, Red Card And VAR!

WOLVERHAMPTON, ENGLAND - MAY 02: Daniel Ballard of Sunderland reacts towards referee Paul Tierney after been shown a red card during the Premier League match between Wolverhampton Wanderers and Sunderland at Molineux on May 02, 2026 in Wolverhampton, England. (Photo by Brett Patzke - WWFC/Wolves via Getty Images) | Wolves via Getty Images The Red Card In a relatively drab and uneventful 90 minutes, the glaring talking point is the moment the entire match turned on its head: Dan Ballard’s red card in the 24th minute. It was a red card by the letter of the law, that’s pretty hard to dispute.

The problem, however, is the law itself. Why has there been a sudden need to clamp down on any form of hair pull as violent conduct? How is it violent conduct or deemed dangerous?

It is pretty self-evident that Ballard is trying to clutch Arokodare’s back in order to pin the imposing striker, and accidentally also grabs his hair. The law is badly imposed, and needs an introduction of a form of force majeure applied based upon intent. It is nonsensical that a tug of any body part, or contact with a bald head, will result in naught but a tug of hair, regardless of impact results in a red card and a three-match suspension – the same punishment given to recklessly endangering an opponent.

Outcome should not always dictate the ruling, but the laws are giving an advantage to those long of hair, and how long before players just go down clutching their hair at every opportunity? It is silly to have put himself in this position with a recent PGMOL clarification on the rule after the Lisandro Martinez incident, and it is a red, but (again) this law of the game is currently ridiculously extreme and ill-thought through. It actually speaks volumes that in the official rulebook on the FA website they state “there is no specific law, but it is deemed as violent conduct”.