NCAAF Roster Management – Part 2. NIL and Shared Revenue Structure
(Photo by Richard Baker / In Pictures via Getty Images) | In Pictures via Getty Images We’re at the front end of the new NCAAF landscape with paid athletes, program GMs, and program managed NIL collectives. Programs have been adapting quickly to the new challenges of the additional NCAA and court requirements, but a new structure has taken form. Also see NCAAF Roster Management – Part 1.
Quick Takes Note: this is the second in a four-part series from longtime OTE reader and commenter ProveIt on roster management, revenue sharing, and NIL distribution in our new era of college football. One of these will run every couple days for the next week or two. I’m very grateful to ProveIt for helping us out in the doldrums.
If YOU’D like to have articles like this published, feel free to email them to minnesotawildcat at gmail dot com — I may have a little back-and-forth if needed, but I’ll get them polished up and published here. And, if you’re interested in writing more full-time for OTE, please feel free to contact me at that same email. —MNW College Sports Commission As part of the House vs.
NCAA settlement, the power conferences created the independent College Sports Commission (CSC) as a separate entity from the NCAA. The NCAA and power conference were more than happy to transfer oversight and enforcement of revenue sharing, NIL deal compliance, roster limits, and enforcement of the House settlement to the CSC. The NCAA and power conferences sought to give the CSC teeth, so they appointed Bryan Seeley as its first CEO: a former U.
S. Department of Justice attorney and head of investigations at Major League Baseball. CSC created NIL Go which evaluates NIL deals using a formula created in partnership with Deloitte – a major audit, consulting, tax and advisory services provider to major firms.
Continue to the original source for the full article.