Tennis’ hindrance call explained: Jack Draper hit by controversial decision against Daniil Medvedev

Jack Draper 's Indian Wells title defence ended in controversial fashion as he suffered a quarter-final defeat to Daniil Medvedev , reigniting the debate surrounding tennis’ hindrance rules. The decisive moment arrived at 5-5, trailing 0-15 in the second set, with Draper already a set down. Needing to fight back to deny Medvedev the chance to serve for the match, the British No 1 levelled the score after his opponent hit a backhand into the net, only for Medvedev to appeal to umpire Aurelie Torte claiming hindrance.

Medvedev had taken issue with Draper raising his arms at a disputed line call midway through the point and after a video review, Torte deemed Draper to have distracted his opponent and awarded a crucial point to Medvedev, allowing him to break. The California crowd made their feelings clear, booing Medvedev at the change of ends and after he sealed victory. The two players had a long chat at the net as they shook hands, with Medvedev saying: "If you're mad at me, I'm sorry," and Draper responding: "I'm not at all - but I don't think it distracted you enough".

It’s the latest instance of contention surrounding the hindrance rule - but why is it in the game, and what are its ins and outs? Here’s everything you need to know. What is the point of the hindrance rule?

The hindrance rule in tennis is designed to stop a player affecting their opponent’s shot. It can also relate to a line judge making the wrong call (i. e.